Head to head
MCP vs Cost Guard MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Connect your AI assistants to Keboola and expose your data, transformations, SQL queries, ...
Full listing
No reviews yet
Pre-flight query cost and result-size guardrails for AI agents on BigQuery, Snowflake, Databricks
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 82). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cost Guard MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Cost Guard MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 86 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |