Head to head
Kangram vs Obelisk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Task & board management for AI agents + humans. Kanban, comments, digests via MCP.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Obelisk (85/100 against 57). Kangram is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obelisk runs on your own machine. Obelisk has noticeably more public adoption.
| Kangram | Obelisk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 40 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-05 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |