Mmcp.market

Head to head

YouTube Video Summarizer (pay-per-call) vs Transcriptor MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

YouTube Video Summarizer (pay-per-call)io.github.JonTelep/summarize-vid
?
No reviews yet

Summarize YouTube videos or fetch transcripts. Pay-per-call via x402 (USDC on Base), no account.

Full listing
Transcriptor MCPio.github.samson-art/transcriptor-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Fetch transcripts, subtitles, chapters, metadata and frames from YouTube and 10+ video platforms

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Transcriptor MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 YouTube Video Summarizer (pay-per-call)Transcriptor MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety grade?A97/100
AdoptionGrowing
GitHub stars21
Downloads / week
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools
Write actions
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT
Last release2026-09-18
CategoryMediaMedia

Other comparisons

YouTube Video Summarizer (pay-per-call) vs Transcriptor MCP: which MCP server should you use? · mcp.market