Head to head
Fcop vs PDF
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Fcop
Cio.github.joinwell52-AI/fcopNo reviews yet
Durable tasks, reports, reviews and branch convergence for multi-agent teams over local files.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PDF (85/100 against 65). PDF has noticeably more public adoption.
| Fcop | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 136 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.2k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 50 | 13 |
| Write actions | 13 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |