Head to head
Wcag22 Css Lint vs World Monitor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Reads your stylesheet and names the success criterion each rule breaks, including the three WCAG 2.2
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 75 tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 95 out of 100). World Monitor is hosted and callable through the gateway; Wcag22 Css Lint runs on your own machine. World Monitor has noticeably more public adoption.
| Wcag22 Css Lint | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A95/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 87k |
| Downloads / week | 615 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |