Mmcp.market

Head to head

Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lint vs MCPProxy

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lintio.github.jmshinhwa/fedramp-oscal-ssp-lint
A
No reviews yet

16 checks on a system-security-plan JSON, in your editor, before a validator returns the package

Full listing
MCPProxyio.github.smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go
B
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lint (89/100 against 73). MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.

 Fedramp Oscal Ssp LintMCPProxy
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100B73/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars0377
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Fedramp Oscal Ssp Lint vs ProdcheckFedramp Oscal Ssp Lint vs npm Registry MCP ServerFedramp Oscal Ssp Lint vs TrentFedramp Oscal Ssp Lint vs Security PreflightFedramp Oscal Ssp Lint vs AARF Utility NetworkAll Security servers