Mmcp.market

Head to head

Connection String Secret Audit vs Secret Hygiene

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Connection String Secret Auditio.github.jmshinhwa/connection-string-secret-audit
A
No reviews yet

26 rules and 32 safe-replacement snippets for hardcoded connection strings, keys and kubeconfigs acr

Full listing
Secret Hygieneio.github.mrfentmen/secret-hygiene-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Count secret-like patterns in bounded local files without returning values, keys, paths,...

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 85 out of 100). Connection String Secret Audit has noticeably more public adoption.

 Connection String Secret AuditSecret Hygiene
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week141–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—1
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-08-09
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Connection String Secret Audit vs grim-mcpConnection String Secret Audit vs GuardvibeConnection String Secret Audit vs DebeziumConnection String Secret Audit vs Security Intel MCPConnection String Secret Audit vs npm Registry MCP ServerAll Security servers