Head to head
GitLab MCP Server vs gha-doctor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Go MCP server for GitLab: 2 dynamic tools reach 1000+ REST/GraphQL actions. Free/CE, no paid tier.
Full listinggha-doctor
Cio.github.linnea-bakshi/gha-doctorNo reviews yet
Diagnose GitHub Actions CI: lint, flaky tests, wasted minutes, health score. Read-only MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitLab MCP Server (97/100 against 68). GitLab MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; gha-doctor runs on your own machine. GitLab MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| GitLab MCP Server | gha-doctor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 37 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |