Head to head
MCP vs OpenQR
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security tools for your AI: scan, pentest, check headers, guard code and scan repos for secrets.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Generate, edit and track dynamic (editable) QR codes with scan analytics. Hosted MCP and REST API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 86 out of 100). OpenQR is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine.
| MCP | OpenQR | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | 778 | 45 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 20 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Security | Security |