Head to head
MCP vs Secret Hygiene
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security tools for your AI: scan, pentest, check headers, guard code and scan repos for secrets.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Count secret-like patterns in bounded local files without returning values, keys, paths,...
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 85 out of 100). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Secret Hygiene | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 778 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-08-09 |
| Category | Security | Security |