Mmcp.market

Head to head

jev-ultrafast-mcp vs KitchenSink4Web

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

jev-ultrafast-mcpio.github.jiawei686/jev-ultrafast-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Hand browser work off to a server-side agent: read the page as a table, act, then verify.

Full listing
KitchenSink4Webio.github.nometalalchemist/kitchensink4web
B
No reviews yet

Browser MCP server: budgeted page reads, honest unread accounting, structured extraction.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours jev-ultrafast-mcp (92/100 against 78).

 jev-ultrafast-mcpKitchenSink4Web
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B78/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars30
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools10—
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-17
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

jev-ultrafast-mcp vs Oya Browserjev-ultrafast-mcp vs AIHawkjev-ultrafast-mcp vs Clickcastjev-ultrafast-mcp vs domscoutjev-ultrafast-mcp vs NodeLane ActAll Scraping and browsing servers