Head to head
jCodemunch MCP vs Petra402
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.
Full listingPetra402
Aio.github.PedroQuatro/petra402No reviews yet
Public web page to markdown, paid per call with x402. First 10 calls free, no signup.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Petra402 (88/100 against 66). Petra402 is hosted and callable through the gateway; jCodemunch MCP runs on your own machine. jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| jCodemunch MCP | Petra402 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2.7k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 6.0k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |