Head to head
jCodemunch MCP vs Lithtrix
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.
Full listingLithtrix
Bio.github.lithtrix/lithtrixNo reviews yet
Identity, memory, trust, and swarm MCP tools for AI agents. Free MIRC + free floors at lithtrix.ai.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours jCodemunch MCP (85/100 against 71). jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| jCodemunch MCP | Lithtrix | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B71/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 2.7k | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 6.0k | 107 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 30 | 3 |
| Write actions | 1 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-06-20 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |