Head to head
jCodemunch MCP vs hospital-mrf-lint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.
Full listing
No reviews yet
15 offline rules read your standard charges JSON the way 45 CFR Part 180 and the CMS template do - t
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours hospital-mrf-lint (89/100 against 66). jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| jCodemunch MCP | hospital-mrf-lint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 2.7k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 6.0k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |