Mmcp.market

Head to head

Codeseeker vs Lacuna Research MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Codeseekerio.github.jghiringhelli/codeseeker
C
No reviews yet

Graph-powered code intelligence with semantic search and knowledge graph for AI assistants

Full listing
Lacuna Research MCPio.github.tiptreesystems/lacuna-research-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Lacuna Research MCP (94/100 against 69). Codeseeker has noticeably more public adoption.

 CodeseekerLacuna Research MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC69/100A94/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars206
Downloads / week259–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools1—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-172026-09-15
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

Codeseeker vs OctocodeCodeseeker vs NeuromcpCodeseeker vs Better Code Review GraphCodeseeker vs SocraticodeCodeseeker vs JunêAll Web search servers