Head to head
Filingapi vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Filingapi
Cio.github.jethrokirk-sudo/filingapiNo reviews yet
SEC filings, earnings transcripts, guidance signals & macro calendar for S&P 500. 11 MCP tools.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Developer-workflow MCP server for catalyst-core: migration guidance, debugging, and task planning.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (80/100 against 67). Filingapi is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Filingapi | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 92 |
| Downloads / week | – | 29 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 10 | 13 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |