Mmcp.market

Head to head

Memento vs PDF

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Mementoio.github.jee1/memento-mcp-server
B
No reviews yet

Agent memory MCP server with 4-type cognitive memory, hybrid search, and TTL-based forgetting.

Full listing
PDFio.github.jztan/pdf-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PDF (85/100 against 77). PDF has noticeably more public adoption.

 MementoPDF
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0136
Downloads / week2931.2k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—13
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Memento vs IWEMemento vs ContextStream MCP ServerMemento vs Total Agent MemoryMemento vs haiku.ragMemento vs Fidelis MemoryAll AI and agents servers