Head to head
Security Preflight vs FlowSentry
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Security Preflight
Bio.github.jdhart81/security-preflightNo reviews yet
Static MCP, source-code and injection-indicator checks with redacted signed receipts.
Full listingFlowSentry
Fio.github.vasilicasijarvis/flowsentryNo reviews yet
Security scanner for n8n workflows + live MCP Trust-Check. 18 rules, OWASP mapped. Paid x402 API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Security Preflight (81/100 against 17). Security Preflight has noticeably more public adoption.
| Security Preflight | FlowSentry | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B81/100 | F17/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 3 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |