Head to head
Security Preflight vs Quiet Failures
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Security Preflight
Bio.github.jdhart81/security-preflightNo reviews yet
Static MCP, source-code and injection-indicator checks with redacted signed receipts.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Open weekly security base rates (CC BY 4.0), plus live DMARC, takeover and WHOIS checks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Security Preflight (81/100 against 56).
| Security Preflight | Quiet Failures | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B81/100 | C56/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 6 |
| Write actions | 1 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |