Head to head
pixelpact vs cadloop Slicer
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Extract a visual contract from a reference page and measure an implementation against it
Full listingNo reviews yet
Find printer profiles, check bed fit, slice to .gcode.3mf and extract the G-code.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 88 out of 100). pixelpact has noticeably more public adoption.
| pixelpact | cadloop Slicer | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 17 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 75 | 36 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 4 | 16 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-08-04 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |