Head to head
loci vs Obsidian Turbocharged
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Cross-session memory and hybrid RAG over your notes and docs. Local-first, with cited answers.
Full listingObsidian Turbocharged
Cio.github.The-40-Thieves/obsidian-tcNo reviews yet
Model-agnostic, agent-ready Obsidian MCP server with RBAC, SLSA provenance, and native search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours loci (92/100 against 65).
| loci | Obsidian Turbocharged | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 90 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | 201 | 757 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |