Head to head
NUM vs GitWarren
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real places for your agent. Search 2.5M+ travel places; submit a business for human review.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Code review on your own machine, for you and your coding agent. Nothing leaves your computer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 86 out of 100). NUM is hosted and callable through the gateway; GitWarren runs on your own machine. GitWarren has noticeably more public adoption.
| NUM | GitWarren | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 16 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.0k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | 17 |
| Write actions | 2 | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |