Mmcp.market

Head to head

HubVibe Site Audits vs Crawlgraph

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HubVibe Site Auditsio.github.Its-fortunatefolly/hubvibe
A
No reviews yet

Rule-based site audits: accessibility, SEO, security headers, performance. Metered per call.

Full listing
Crawlgraphio.github.pipeworx-io/crawlgraph
B
No reviews yet

CrawlGraph MCP — backlink intelligence on the public Common Crawl webgraph

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HubVibe Site Audits (85/100 against 77).

 HubVibe Site AuditsCrawlgraph
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100B77/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars20
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools1042
Write actions—4
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

HubVibe Site Audits vs Google Ads + Meta Ads + SEO/GEO MCPHubVibe Site Audits vs Suede Skills MCPHubVibe Site Audits vs Log10x MCPHubVibe Site Audits vs MencoroHubVibe Site Audits vs connskill-growth-mcpAll SEO servers