Head to head
p-e relay (remote) vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
p-e relay (remote)
Aio.github.it-start/relay-uiNo reviews yet
Remote MCP access to the p-e relay store. Reads are open; writes and waits are signed.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Typed record store + hybrid search over MCP: deterministic lookups + semantic memory, per-customer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours p-e relay (remote) (91/100 against 82). p-e relay (remote) is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| p-e relay (remote) | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 299 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | 23 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |