Head to head
IronWallet vs Token Risk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Non-custodial crypto wallet MCP: check balances, sign and send transfers, and swap tokens locally.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours IronWallet (94/100 against 77). Token Risk is hosted and callable through the gateway; IronWallet runs on your own machine.
| IronWallet | Token Risk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 89 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 18 | 38 |
| Write actions | 5 | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |