Mmcp.market

Head to head

IONOS CLOUD MCP Server vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

IONOS CLOUD MCP Serverio.github.ionos-cloud/ionoscloud-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Inspect and manage IONOS CLOUD infrastructure via MCP. Writes are opt-in and off by default.

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH — policy-gated remote access (83/100 against 75). SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 IONOS CLOUD MCP ServerSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB75/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars7745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-172026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

IONOS CLOUD MCP Server vs Azure MCP ServerIONOS CLOUD MCP Server vs SemioticIONOS CLOUD MCP Server vs World MonitorIONOS CLOUD MCP Server vs NetdataIONOS CLOUD MCP Server vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers