Head to head
Topup vs Slidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrate
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Travel eSIMs in 200+ destinations and top-ups in 150+ countries, paid in USDC via x402
Full listing
No reviews yet
Encrypted one-time secret handoff, x402 pre-flight, and web page change checks and watches.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Slidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrate (85/100 against 60). Topup is hosted and callable through the gateway; Slidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrate runs on your own machine. Slidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrate has noticeably more public adoption.
| Topup | Slidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrate | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 358 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 9 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | ISC |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |