Head to head
Invoke — hire a human from your AI agent (first post free) vs Agent Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Free-first Chinese and English web search MCP using zero-key sources and inspectable evidence.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent Search (83/100 against 60). Invoke — hire a human from your AI agent (first post free) is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Search runs on your own machine. Agent Search has noticeably more public adoption.
| Invoke — hire a human from your AI agent (first post free) | Agent Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 111 |
| Downloads / week | – | 96 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | 7 |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |
Other comparisons
Invoke — hire a human from your AI agent (first post free) vs Basic MemoryInvoke — hire a human from your AI agent (first post free) vs Agent-Native ChatInvoke — hire a human from your AI agent (first post free) vs CHAP CoordinatorInvoke — hire a human from your AI agent (first post free) vs three.ws AgoraInvoke — hire a human from your AI agent (first post free) vs SocialclawAll AI and agents servers