Head to head
MCP Server vs Kirok Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Keyword, semantic, hybrid, and SQL retrieval for AI agents, local or on Infino Cloud.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Persistent memory for AI agents - hybrid semantic + keyword recall with autonomous consolidation
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (91/100 against 83).
| MCP Server | Kirok Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 99 | 18 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 19 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |