Head to head
Code Context vs TED Tender Monitor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local code search for AI coding agents: hybrid keyword + semantic + SQL over an index in your repo.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search EU TED procurement notices by CPV, country, keyword, value, or type.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Code Context (91/100 against 76). TED Tender Monitor is hosted and callable through the gateway; Code Context runs on your own machine.
| Code Context | TED Tender Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B76/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 31 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 70 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | 1 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |