Head to head
Incarn vs mcp-video
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Compatibility package: mcp-video now installs Kinocut (formerly mcp-video).
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-video (91/100 against 56). Incarn is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-video runs on your own machine. mcp-video has noticeably more public adoption.
| Incarn | mcp-video | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C56/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 160 |
| Downloads / week | – | 335 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Media | Media |