Head to head
webhook-inbox vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
webhook-inbox
Cco.kymac.inbox/webhook-inboxNo reviews yet
Ephemeral HTTPS inbox for bots: mint URL, capture POSTs, list JSON. TEST. https://inbox.kymac.co
Full listing
No reviews yet
Email infrastructure for AI agents: send, read replies as threads, campaigns, per-key limits.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (84/100 against 67). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| webhook-inbox | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 628 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 15 | 55 |
| Write actions | 10 | 16 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category |