Head to head
Browsentic vs Usable Browser Agent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hands your real, logged-in browser to your agent: an AI side panel extension, also over MCP.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server and Firefox add-on that let an AI agent drive your real, logged-in browser. Free tier.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 91 out of 100). Browsentic has noticeably more public adoption.
| Browsentic | Usable Browser Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 26 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 550 | 184 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 1 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-26 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |