Head to head
Browsentic vs Developer Tools
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hands your real, logged-in browser to your agent: an AI side panel extension, also over MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
65+ free in-browser developer tools (JSON, Base64, JWT, hash, regex…) callable over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Browsentic (85/100 against 57). Developer Tools is hosted and callable through the gateway; Browsentic runs on your own machine. Browsentic has noticeably more public adoption.
| Browsentic | Developer Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 26 | – |
| Downloads / week | 550 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 1 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |