Head to head
Zuul vs walkerOS Flow
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Zuul CI — build failure analysis, log search, pipeline status, and job configuration
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Zuul (92/100 against 83). walkerOS Flow has noticeably more public adoption.
| Zuul | walkerOS Flow | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 21 | 344 |
| Downloads / week | 72 | 271 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 49 | 16 |
| Write actions | 3 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |