Head to head
Geolint vs autorouter
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Geolint
Aio.github.iliasabk/geolintNo reviews yet
ESLint for AI search: audits AI-crawler access, llms.txt, schema and citability.
Full listing
No reviews yet
An MCP capability router: one search tool instead of every server's tool schema.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 86 out of 100).
| Geolint | autorouter | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.1k | 611 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |