Head to head
Misakanet vs SEC Filings
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Failure-memory layer for coding agents: search evidence-rated failure lessons by error text.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Official SEC EDGAR filings, financial data and full-text search. Every answer cites its source.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Misakanet (92/100 against 57). SEC Filings is hosted and callable through the gateway; Misakanet runs on your own machine. Misakanet has noticeably more public adoption.
| Misakanet | SEC Filings | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 493 | – |
| Downloads / week | 373 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |