Head to head
SearXNG Search vs Apple Mail
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search, read and act on Apple Mail — threads, attachments, body search, writes off by default
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Apple Mail (92/100 against 83). SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.
| SearXNG Search | Apple Mail | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.2k | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 13k | 782 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |