Head to head
Automan vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Autonomous AI agent selling pay-per-call skills settled with x402 micropayments (USDC).
Full listingNo reviews yet
Agent-native global eSIM: buy for 193 countries, per-MB in USDT/USDC. Agents earn 20% referral.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Automan (87/100 against 78). MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Automan | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 456 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 12 | 12 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |