Head to head
Signalfuse vs Stelar Signals
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
11 tools: crypto signals, sentiment, macro regime, arena, search, exec. x402 pay-per-call.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Crypto market signals and portfolio telemetry. 6 tools pay-per-call in USDC, no API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Stelar Signals (91/100 against 80). Stelar Signals is hosted and callable through the gateway; Signalfuse runs on your own machine.
| Signalfuse | Stelar Signals | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 42 | 28 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 11 | 12 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-08-25 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |