Head to head
Humanread Publisher vs Perenna
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Publish Git-backed multilingual novels with agents, safe layouts, reviews, and author approval.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Perenna (83/100 against 60). Humanread Publisher is hosted and callable through the gateway; Perenna runs on your own machine. Perenna has noticeably more public adoption.
| Humanread Publisher | Perenna | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 40 |
| Downloads / week | – | 75 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |