Mmcp.market

Head to head

HumanMirror Outcome vs Husk

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HumanMirror Outcomefr.humanmirror/outcome
C
No reviews yet

Verified AI-agent outcomes: secret scanning, JSON cleanup, dedupe, anomaly and schema checks.

Full listing
Huskio.github.husk-security/husk
A
No reviews yet

Local-first defensive scanner for vulnerable dependencies, leaked secrets, and risky agent configs

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Husk (91/100 against 58). HumanMirror Outcome is hosted and callable through the gateway; Husk runs on your own machine. Husk has noticeably more public adoption.

 HumanMirror OutcomeHusk
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC58/100A91/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–6
Downloads / week–72
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-14
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

HumanMirror Outcome vs Google SurfHumanMirror Outcome vs DvalincodeHumanMirror Outcome vs SanityHumanMirror Outcome vs PRIMAMCPHumanMirror Outcome vs PatchloomAll AI and agents servers