Head to head
OctoCounts MCP Server vs Recall
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Analyze and compare public GitHub repo line counts (SLOC) via OctoCounts, from any MCP client.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OctoCounts MCP Server (92/100 against 57). Recall is hosted and callable through the gateway; OctoCounts MCP Server runs on your own machine. OctoCounts MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| OctoCounts MCP Server | Recall | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 12 | – |
| Downloads / week | 37 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |