Head to head
Hronaut Browser MCP vs Ghost
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Control visible, persistent Hronaut browser workspaces through a local MCP connection.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Verified desktop control for agents on Windows and Linux: apps with no API, windows, shell, browser.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Hronaut Browser MCP (85/100 against 68).
| Hronaut Browser MCP | Ghost | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 25 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-06 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |