Mmcp.market

Head to head

HLA-Verify vs jCodemunch MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HLA-Verifycom.hlaverify/hla-verify
A
No reviews yet

HLA nomenclature and match checks against a pinned IPD-IMGT/HLA release. No patient identifiers.

Full listing
jCodemunch MCPio.github.jgravelle/jcodemunch-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HLA-Verify (87/100 against 66). HLA-Verify is hosted and callable through the gateway; jCodemunch MCP runs on your own machine. jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 HLA-VerifyjCodemunch MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA87/100C66/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars02.7k
Downloads / week–6.0k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools1030
Write actions11
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0NOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryEverything elseEverything else