Head to head
Kagami vs sqz
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Kagami
Cio.github.Hiroshi-Ichiyanagi/kagamiNo reviews yet
Deterministic prompt-injection detector; signed, offline-verifiable verdicts. Not an LLM.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Pre-injection context compression for coding agents. Zero LLM calls, zero telemetry, offline-safe.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours sqz (88/100 against 67). Kagami is hosted and callable through the gateway; sqz runs on your own machine. sqz has noticeably more public adoption.
| Kagami | sqz | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 627 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |