Head to head
DocsMint vs Video History Project
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Cloud or self-hosted knowledge for AI agents: hybrid search, reranking, GraphRAG, scoped MCP tools.
Full listingVideo History Project
Corg.videohistoryproject/researchNo reviews yet
Search experimental video history, read public records, follow sources and export citations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DocsMint (96/100 against 69). DocsMint has noticeably more public adoption.
| DocsMint | Video History Project | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A96/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 55 | – |
| Downloads / week | 983 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |