Mmcp.market

Head to head

Fidelis Memory vs mcp-local-rag

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Fidelis Memoryio.github.hermes-labs-ai/fidelis-memory
C
No reviews yet

Recall locally stored agent memories through an MCP-compatible host.

Full listing
mcp-local-ragio.github.shinpr/mcp-local-rag
A
No reviews yet

Easy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configuration

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-local-rag (92/100 against 57). mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 Fidelis Memorymcp-local-rag
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC57/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars23399
Downloads / week–4.7k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Fidelis Memory vs ha-mcpFidelis Memory vs mcpFidelis Memory vs IWEFidelis Memory vs fiori-mcp-serverFidelis Memory vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers