Mmcp.market

Head to head

Fidelis Memory vs Recall — persistent memory for agents

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Fidelis Memoryio.github.hermes-labs-ai/fidelis-memory
B
No reviews yet

Recall locally stored agent memories through an MCP-compatible host.

Full listing
Recall — persistent memory for agentsdev.workers.notdown-app.recall/memory
C
No reviews yet

Persistent memory for AI agents. Free, no LLM, no SDK. Open Worker you can self-host in 2 commands.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fidelis Memory (83/100 against 60). Recall — persistent memory for agents is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fidelis Memory runs on your own machine. Fidelis Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Fidelis MemoryRecall — persistent memory for agents
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C60/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars23–
Downloads / week382–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—5
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-19—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Fidelis Memory vs Total Agent MemoryFidelis Memory vs Basic MemoryFidelis Memory vs Claude Real VideoFidelis Memory vs IWEFidelis Memory vs ContextStream MCP ServerAll AI and agents servers