Mmcp.market

Head to head

Fidelis Memory vs Pearl

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Fidelis Memoryio.github.hermes-labs-ai/fidelis-memory
B
No reviews yet

Recall locally stored agent memories through an MCP-compatible host.

Full listing
Pearlio.github.Pearl-Passport/pearl-agent-plugin
A
No reviews yet

Pearl places, table availability, and confirmed visit, save and trip actions for reviewed hosts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pearl (95/100 against 83). Pearl is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fidelis Memory runs on your own machine. Fidelis Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Fidelis MemoryPearl
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A95/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars231
Downloads / week382–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Fidelis Memory vs Total Agent MemoryFidelis Memory vs Hicortex — AI Fleet MemoryFidelis Memory vs Agent Memory OsFidelis Memory vs Basic MemoryFidelis Memory vs Claude Real VideoAll AI and agents servers